<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mandatory Minimum Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triskele.com/2006/02/27/mandatory-minimum-insurance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triskele.com/2006/02/27/mandatory-minimum-insurance</link>
	<description>Political &#38; actuarial musings and assorted roadgeek trivia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.triskele.com/2006/02/27/mandatory-minimum-insurance/comment-page-1#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.triskele.com/2006/02/27/mandatory-minimum-insurance/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You are right in the sense that low-impact accidents are more common and at least they would be protected from them (until they&#039;re non-renewed from the program because they no longer meet the conditions of a good driver.) but I guess maybe the fact that I speak with insurance customers on a semi-regularly basis leads me to believe that people don&#039;t understand insurance.
They don&#039;t know what 10/20/3 is, all that they know is that they&#039;re purchasing insurance. Speaking with customers who&#039;ve realized that their insurance isn&#039;t going to be much help isn&#039;t that fun of an experience.
Thanks for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right in the sense that low-impact accidents are more common and at least they would be protected from them (until they&#8217;re non-renewed from the program because they no longer meet the conditions of a good driver.) but I guess maybe the fact that I speak with insurance customers on a semi-regularly basis leads me to believe that people don&#8217;t understand insurance.<br />
They don&#8217;t know what 10/20/3 is, all that they know is that they&#8217;re purchasing insurance. Speaking with customers who&#8217;ve realized that their insurance isn&#8217;t going to be much help isn&#8217;t that fun of an experience.<br />
Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.triskele.com/2006/02/27/mandatory-minimum-insurance/comment-page-1#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.triskele.com/2006/02/27/mandatory-minimum-insurance/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve always like Andrew Tobias&#039; idea:  pay at the pump, private, no fault insurance.  The idea is laid out in his book &quot;AUTO INSURANCE ALERT!&quot;, out of print now but very interesting.  Do away with agents, do away with advertising, do away with uninsured motorist.  Written in &#039;93 it doesn&#039;t mention hybrid cars,but still worth a look.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always like Andrew Tobias&#8217; idea:  pay at the pump, private, no fault insurance.  The idea is laid out in his book &#8220;AUTO INSURANCE ALERT!&#8221;, out of print now but very interesting.  Do away with agents, do away with advertising, do away with uninsured motorist.  Written in &#8216;93 it doesn&#8217;t mention hybrid cars,but still worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
